BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Transfer List Limit

Transfer List Limit

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
316325.5 in reply to 316325.1
Date: 10/17/2022 6:19:04 AM
Rajdersi
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
5959
Second Team:
Rajdersi II
Unrealistic values- good idea.

But you might hurt managers who tries to sell normal player with reasonable market value(or even lower than market value).
For few weeks I am trying to sell PF worth max 1,5kk without luck, now I am trying with 700k.

Of course demand depends on bb calendar

This Post:
77
316325.6 in reply to 316325.5
Date: 10/23/2022 1:36:22 AM
deanswer
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
190190
Second Team:
dequestion
I totally disagree

Lot of times it is not the price that is incorrect, it is the timing.
why after training a player for seasons, shall I sell him at a low price for this new rule…?
cor this kind of players you need weeks to get paid a good price. And in general for all value player.

What is the problem of offering a player and do not sell him? only some more player on TL, it is not such a big disturb. Loosing 1m in a sales or gat GS drops it is a big problem.
About merchandising, Fans survey already decrease when a player is on TL.

What i would avoid is buying players for cup games and fire them on Sunday. It is plenty of them. It seems that if you cant lot of time on it, it will be difficult to compete.
I would introduce a rule that you have to pay the salary if you fire a player with salary over 10 K. (Not less to save scrimmages)
Or just put a maximum of free fire a season

Last edited by deanswer at 10/23/2022 1:43:06 AM

S52 CUP WINNER S66 BBM11 winner "non dire gatto se non ce l'hai nel sacco"
This Post:
11
316325.14 in reply to 316325.13
Date: 11/28/2022 4:58:32 AM
Hortatus
IV.50
Overall Posts Rated:
13091309
I remember the past requests were made to limit the number of times a player could end up on the transfer market, and other times there was talk of how to help new managers better assess the value of a player.

In this direction, perhaps a graph could be created, in the same style as the salary history, with the various times the player was placed on the market and at what amount, indicating with different colors whether the transfer took place or not.

This way new users can rate a player who has been put on the market many times at the same price and has always gone unsold as a "defect" and think he is not worth that value.

On the other hand, a manager who in need (to replace an injured person, to increase competitiveness in view of the playoffs, etc.) could still assess that the price is worth the risk.

From: lvess
This Post:
00
316325.15 in reply to 316325.14
Date: 11/28/2022 9:47:49 AM
Delaware 87ers
NBBA
Overall Posts Rated:
318318
I can see the thinking behind the original issue here. However, it is not the biggest problem with the transfer market.

Rather, the biggest problem is the fact that a manager can increase their own bid multiple times in a row on a single player. I know I'm probably alone in viewing this as a problem but I see no good reason why this is allowed. It seems like it is a good way for two managers to collude by dumping money from one to another.

Bringing it back to the original issues raised in this thread. Why is it viewed as ok for a single manager to increase a bid from $1000 to over $1M all by themselves and that isn't seen as a problem, yet a manager trying to sell a player multiple times until they get the value they think he's worth is a problem and needs to be stopped?

Advertisement