BuzzerBeater Forums

The match with Belgium was played.
On Friday, 2 players received skill upgrades - Boyd and MacKersey. MacKersey got as many as three very useful skills. Before the game, the squad had problems: Corbet, Barrie, MacKersey, MacArthur, Baillie received more than 100 game minutes over the past week. As a result, I did not take Corbet, Barrie, MacKersey into the application for the game - they have a form below 7. In addition, Spens was injured on Saturday, it's good that only for one week. As a result, we were left without bigmen, only Losiak remained. I haven't started calling anyone to the team yet, the guys from the reserve also have a form below 8.
Therefore, I decided to play Patient with SG in position C. The defense played a 3-2 zone. The difference in the level of the teams is huge, so I am very pleased with the result. I expected Lyle to shoot better, I overestimated him a bit at the C position. But MacLamond and Losiak played well. We attacked very well, provoked fouls from the opponent. Apparently, the pressure from Belgium helped us quite well. In defense, I didn't feel much difference from the zone. Although periodically there were good segments.
I will hope that our bigmen will soon return to good shape. We are waiting for the next match with Austria

The match with Austria was played.
On Friday, we received only one upgrade, from Ballie. Everything was good with the form of the players, even Spens with 43 minutes last week got form 8 for the first time in the season and recovered the day before the game. I decided to try Princeton in the attack. Apparently this is not the most effective tactic for us, but there was no big failure. Again, a strange distribution of throws and few FT. We held up well in the first half of the game, but we failed in the third quarter, especially in defense. After two matches, it is difficult to say how effective the tactics of the 3-2 zone are, and whether it is better than the personnel. I would like to get a difference of less than 30 points, but Austria is a pretty strong and even team.
The next game is with Macedonia, we will continue our experiments.

Well, for a 3-2 Defense, it does help if you have players with great blocking skills on PF/C. Then, you can even play a 3-2 against LI. To just counter an outside offense, the 3-2 from today worked fine I guess. But Boyd did not help to strengthen the 3-2. He is better suited for M2M (at the moment and also for the long run). To have a stronger 3-2, you'd need three guards with good OD on 1-3 ... but it's ok. It's nice to see the team gaining experience. It'll take some time until the players have reached the zenith but we'll get there.

Thanks for the opinion of Alexis. This is logical. Even against external tactics, the benefits are not very great. ManToMan looks more reliable and versatile. I completely agree

Thanks for the opinion of Alexis. This is logical. Even against external tactics, the benefits are not very great. ManToMan looks more reliable and versatile. I completely agree

Well, it is a valid choice if your opponent has a very strong outside offense. And it also helps intercept passes meant for the Inside-Players. That's why some nations train their players like that: (47458608) Those players work very well with a 3-2 zone defense against LI. To be sure to cover every possibility, you can even set an inside-GDP. Then the 3-2 defense would stop any outside offense like motion/rng and if they go inside, those two bigmen with crazy ID and especially Blocking will defend like hell. And with the Inside-GDP, they'll even get a boost for inside defense. Meaning less passes reach the players attacking inside and if they reach them, they've got those defensive monsters right in front of them. Finland has played like that for quite a while and been pretty successful, especially in a time where no other nations used those tactics.

The match with Macedonia was played.
Last Friday we received a good number of upgrades: Boyd - 1, Fitchy - 1, Lyle - 2, Baillie - 1, MacShimes - 1.
In addition, most of the team was in good shape. Spens me surprised, having played 34 minutes over the past week, he increased his form from 8 to 9. Amazing.
Without a doubt, the high form, as well as the fantastic implementation of FT and the advantage in rebound gave us the opportunity to fight in the match, to be on an equal footing with Macedonia for most of the game. But we are still weaker in the grade.
The next match is with my compatriots. I want to give a fight too

Great to see that the team continues to improve! You're getting closer to that first victory. Looking really forward to see that team with a couple of more ups perform in about 2 seasons time.

What exactly did happen today? RUSSIA going for a CT against Scotland? And still almost losing the game. That is great news, even if it's yet another loss ... great game, congrats (even if Russias enthusiasm was supposedly pretty low after probably 2 CTs prior to this game, one definitely confirmed) ...

I guess the team is moving into the right direction. Especially the top players are close to reaching international level. I hope that in the future we'll have more great players off the bench that are equally capable to start the occasional game.

Great work, TRUF!

(and of course all the managers that keep training their NT players!!)

The match with Russia was played.
On Friday we received 2 upgrades: Lyle - 1, MacShimes - 1. For the third week I am very happy with the form of the players. The managers of the national team players are great fellows.
On the one hand, Russia had less enthusinasm. But on the other hand, the opponent played Crunch Time.
Still, defeat is natural. I was also pleased with Lyle. Being in the form of 8, he was able to consistently score points throughout the match.
We have a match with Denmark ahead of us. The Danes were able to defeat Macedonia in this round. Apparently, this is the match of the season for us. We will strive to win.

The group stage of the European Championship has ended, we still managed to finish the tournament with a great match. We beat the Danes, it was not easy, but we were able to =) Out of six groups, we are the only ones with a victory from the teams in eighth place.
It's great that after a short week, almost all the players have not lost their shape. We played very well in defense. And in attack, all the players played steadily, they threw three-pointers very well. I was surprised that the coach of the Danes did not play CT.
On Friday, we received only 1 upgrade from Boyd. A series of friendly matches is ahead. Let's see who we can agree on the next matches with

The group stage of the European Championship has ended, we still managed to finish the tournament with a great match. We beat the Danes, it was not easy, but we were able to =) Out of six groups, we are the only ones with a victory from the teams in eighth place.
It's great that after a short week, almost all the players have not lost their shape. We played very well in defense. And in attack, all the players played steadily, they threw three-pointers very well. I was surprised that the coach of the Danes did not play CT.
On Friday, we received only 1 upgrade from Boyd. A series of friendly matches is ahead. Let's see who we can agree on the next matches with

congratulations!!!