BuzzerBeater Forums

Private League 221 > Top teams/economics

Top teams/economics

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
40832.1
Date: 07/29/2008 17:37:11
Overall Posts Rated:
00
There's a fair few I and II teams in here.
Who feels screwed and who thinks "not so bad"?

I was pretty angry to start with - things don't look so bad after lengthy consideration.

They're only solving inflation, not the "problem" of truly massive teams in the world earning sacks of cash.

This Post:
00
40832.2 in reply to 40832.1
Date: 07/29/2008 17:55:46
Overall Posts Rated:
8383
Yes it's just a temporary patch...

It will be very difficult if my arena isn't full next season...

But i think that is necesserary because player are too expensive.

I paid $ 2 500 000 for this player (22 years) it's crazy o_O :

Jump shot: fort ↑ Portée shoot: fort
Def. extérieure: fort Agilité: respectable
Dribble: fort Passe: respectable
Shoot intérieur: inepte Déf. intérieure: horrible
Rebond: respectable Contre: inepte
Endurance: respectable Lancer franc: médiocre

Experience: pitoyable

Last edited by Mirouf at 07/29/2008 18:06:11

This Post:
00
40832.3 in reply to 40832.1
Date: 07/30/2008 20:21:32
Overall Posts Rated:
1919
There's a fair few I and II teams in here.
Who feels screwed and who thinks "not so bad"?

I was pretty angry to start with - things don't look so bad after lengthy consideration.

They're only solving inflation, not the "problem" of truly massive teams in the world earning sacks of cash.


I'm currently traveling (in Vermont right now) so I haven't been paying close attention the past few days.

I suppose that the economic situation will make things a little more difficult, but I wasn't really too close to the edge to begin with and all of the teams in my division are going to have the same economic realities, so I'm not really concerned. I'd rather that teams from II have a fighting chance in I, rather than there being a huge gap.

That way, it'll feel even better when I stomp those noobs back to II. ;)

This Post:
00
40832.4 in reply to 40832.3
Date: 08/01/2008 12:06:01
Overall Posts Rated:
00
The main fear is that division II teams will now be able to make more money than division I teams.

If they don't want teams to camp at a particular level, these changes were not the way forward IMO.

This Post:
00
40832.5 in reply to 40832.4
Date: 08/02/2008 15:07:35
Overall Posts Rated:
1919
The main fear is that division II teams will now be able to make more money than division I teams.

If they don't want teams to camp at a particular level, these changes were not the way forward IMO.

Oh, well that stinks then!

Though, since there are a few BBs in the US who can't quite cut it in the NBBA, it makes sense that they'd want to help out teams in II. ;)