BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Promotion Cutoff?

Promotion Cutoff?

Set priority
Show messages by
From: TwoPint
This Post:
00
59550.1
Date: 11/19/2008 22:21:05
Overall Posts Rated:
22
Anyone know what the cutoff for wins by runner-ups for promotion to div. 3 was this last season? I obviously fell below the cutoff, but just curious to know what it was. Thanks.

This Post:
00
59550.2 in reply to 59550.1
Date: 11/19/2008 22:43:49
Overall Posts Rated:
224224
Anyone know what the cutoff for wins by runner-ups for promotion to div. 3 was this last season? I obviously fell below the cutoff, but just curious to know what it was. Thanks.

The promotion is not designed for runners-up. Each bot team in upper division is replaced by the best non-promoted team from the lower level based on regular season win-loss record. So for the sake of argument, if there are 10 bots in the league level above you, the top 10 non-promoted teams in the overall ranking will be promoted in the bots' steads.

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
59550.3 in reply to 59550.2
Date: 11/20/2008 10:21:49
Overall Posts Rated:
22
I was under the impression that first priority went to the losers of the championship games...and then overall record came into play once they were all promoted.

An example of this would be from season 5 of my league (IV.7). Look at season 5...Jacktown lost the championship game, yet was promoted with a 17-5 record. The New York Knuckleheads, with a 19-3 record, were not promoted.

This is inconsistent with how you described the promotions, so a clarification would be appreciated.

From: Jokehim

This Post:
00
59550.4 in reply to 59550.3
Date: 11/20/2008 11:39:55
Jokehim Maniacs
SBBL
Overall Posts Rated:
188188
Second Team:
Jokehim Maniacs II
It is first based on at which stage you went out. Losers of division final are first teams to replace bot teams and among them the ones with best record will get promoted.

Would not make sense to me if a team with 22-0 got promoted if they lost their first playoff game. Doubt that it works like that with "Lucky losers" (as they are called in tennis) in any sport.

This Post:
00
59550.5 in reply to 59550.4
Date: 11/20/2008 11:59:58
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
Would not make sense to me if a team with 22-0 got promoted if they lost their first playoff game. Doubt that it works like that with "Lucky losers" (as they are called in tennis) in any sport.


That is how it is supposed to work.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
59550.6 in reply to 59550.5
Date: 11/20/2008 16:40:51
Overall Posts Rated:
00
I don't get it I lost in the finals of iv49 yet didn'y get promoted? Do you have to win to get promoted?

This Post:
00
59550.7 in reply to 59550.6
Date: 11/20/2008 17:11:58
Overall Posts Rated:
44
with the declining number of bot teams in the upper divisions its more likely that you will have to win your league's championship.

This Post:
00
59550.8 in reply to 59550.5
Date: 11/20/2008 18:38:57
Overall Posts Rated:
22
Still waiting for someone to explain what happened in season 5 in my league, then...with the team with the better record not getting promoted over the team that lost in the finals.

Was there a change in the order of promotion during the last couple seasons?

This Post:
00
59550.9 in reply to 59550.8
Date: 11/20/2008 22:15:46
Overall Posts Rated:
154154
the definition in rules for this case is "next best team". Really safe way to say nothing:) But I think it is reasonable to think that the team with the best record is the next best team, at least everything in divisions (except home court in relegation games) is based on record. I would understand if from the teams with best records runner-ups would be prefered but I think the record is based on rules.