I cannot find a similar thread, so I open a new one - in case there is one, just tell me.
Look at my series. My pupil Roberto Scalambrieri was classified at top of most of stats after game 3, having played 2 out of 3 games (66%). Now, he is considered not having played enough games, although he is 3 out of 4 (75%). Any reason for that?
edit: and if you look at his and other players individual stats in player's page, averages are counted on the wrong number of matches (last one is missing). If so, he could result having played 2 out of 4. But if stats were not updated, why classification is?
Last edited by GM-BlackMouse at 04/06/2010 18:05:54