BuzzerBeater Forums

Teemo raises a good point here that I forgot to mention regarding the 3-2. The SB on our bigs was too low to be fully effective. Although that cannot be fixed for that game, it can be something that is fixed in the future. SB as a whole tends to be overlooked in my experience. Not every big needs to have it, but if a team wants to effectively run a zone, it is a must. In the future I will help train a wider variety of players, including a big with SB to help us be an overall team. We get a lot of guards with just 1v1F, OD, and PA. We get a lot of donkey bigs with high IS/ID and medium REB with little SB. We have a lot of players that do the same thing, with little variety. I believe that with a more versatile team, with a variety of player builds, USA can once again return to its former glory. This is a goal I have in mind that will shape the future. While looking at the past IS useful for gaining knowledge... it is time to focus on the future of this nation, and build a stronger base for our eventual dynasty.

When I candidated 2 seasons ago, I emphasized the need of versatility of the team. So I would have played more outside attacks during the season, even if it would have meant more risks of defeat during the group phases.

Concerning the final, there are two main problems for USA :

- first the pace GDP of Spain : while having an average OD and a big flow from USA, it ended in 11 passes for 13 TO. That is an awful ratio for a LI. Versatility should be able to block these double GDP.

- 3-2 zone defense with inside GDP : there I will disagree with GM-Nick. This was not a bad choice according to me. USA OD was very high and Spain flow very low. But they had 26 passes for 11 to. Something doesn't feel right here. I don't know if we can attribute this to random generated numbers but it may have been an important factor. However seeing the players on sale right now, I would also say that you don't have enough SB on your inside players to benefit enough from this 3-2 zone specifity.

As one of the rare advocates of SB:
What level is your “recommendation” for bigs, SFs, and Gs, for effective zone usage?

Side note: what are your same thing considering passing levels per position group?

Obviously you work with what you get, but what would you find ideal?

@Nick. I ask you as well.

From last season’s Silver medal team:
Both of you have mentioned about tactical and lineup choices.

Would either of you be willing to expand on specific games and specific lineup differences you would have done for either tactical or player utilization reasons?

We’re there players you felt were over utilized? Under utilized?

Nick, I hate you.

Aw I love you too

In response to JK:

I admire the amount of time and effort JKalltheway put into the position, and he did a great job as the leader of our team. Its hard to pick anything he did wrong, because he also did a lot of things right. But if i have to...

The first game of the season Jk makes a minor roster move that sets us down in enthusiasm, and we pick up one of our two losses on the season. While in the end essentially meaningless, since he fixed it and won every other game save the finals, its easy to overlook this mistake. If I become the U21 coach, I will keep my skinny fingers as far away from the drop players button as I can unless I need to.

The only other thing he did, as well as most of his supporting staff, was assume our strengths. He assumed that our LI would be untouchable, and that our Bigs were much better than Spain's. However, they were actually quite comparable, and due to a double gap, Spain was able to pull out the win. I would run Li a little earlier in the tournament so that we could compare all of our offenses and ensure which is our best, rather than assume.

But as I said above, I have the utmost respect for Jkalltheway and the commitment he gave to this team.

As I said in my speech, I think my biggest strength is my experience as a USA scout, my connections with the rest of the U21 staff, and my desire to form a personal connection with the managers with U21 aspirations, and all managers in general.

While Teemo has served as a scout for his french teams, the French U21 team may have different scouting procedures and training plans than the USA U21. Being involved with the program for the last few years, I already know our system and the way we typically train our players. There will be only a slight bump in our change of leadership, but knowing what I'm walking into will help ensure the smoothest transition possible.

Unlike Teemo, I have worked with the current U21 staff for many seasons. I know who likes to scout and train which types of players. I know who likes to help with tactics. I already have a connection with the staff, whereas Teemo would be a newcomer, and he would have to learn the scouts and the system. I believe my connection with our current staff will allow me to pick up right where JK left, and work towards returning to Gold status.

Over my years as a manager trying to train a player before I was involved in scouting, I was always frustrated by the slow bb-mail responses from scouts or coaches. While I now understand that scouts and coaches are VERY busy, I still consider it a priority to respond to the people as quickly as possible. I believe that I have the strongest desire to build our U21 and USA community of all the candidates, and it is this desire that will help america's talent pool increasing. A greater amount of training will only increase our success.

As far as our staff goes... we have a very good one. We have a few NBBA managers, and some ex-NBBA managers that help with tactics, which is very helpful, in addition to ex-u21 coaches such as JKalltheway that will help the new coach learn the ropes and all of the fundamentals of running the team. I plan on picking up an extra scouting class in order to relieve some stress off of our scouts, as I believe this is one of my strengths, and I will talk with the staff we have available on discord before every game regarding tactics, ensuring activity, involvement, and the best possible tactics. Our wonderful staff has always been our strength, and I know they will continue to be for many seasons.

In regards to SB and an effective zone defense, I would say that SB is helpful but not necessary on guards. If you have a 6 or 7 SB guard that can contest shots well, that only helps, but it is not worth training it. As for SF's it really depends. Depends on whether the other team has an inside or outside SF. Personally I would like the SB to be 8 or 9 on my SF's, in order to be safe against a possible inside attack. As for bigs... this is where it gets tricky. For my starting bigs, I would want at least 10's among both, and preferably up to 12 on at least one of them.

In regards to passing, im a real fan of the true point guard build. I like my PG to have at least 14 PA, and depending on the offense, my SG so have at minimum 12, and preferably 14 also. On the SF, it depends on his build. an offensive SF, PA should be about 11-12. A defensive SF should be about 12-13. And as far as bigs go, I think 6+ is generally a good bar. This was an issue we struggled with last season, where our best passing big was 4 PA.

Oh thats easy. I would have sat Julius Saunders... which game you say? EVERY game. I would have called up Robert Johnson and started him instead.

In all seriousness though, in our first game against Spain I would not have run LI. It wasn't a must win game for us, so no reason for us to use what we thought was our best offense. Using LI against Spain the first time allowed them to hone in on a double gap when we did the same thing in the finals. I would have chosen a LP offense for that game instead, saving the LI for the finals.

Also I was not a fan of the base offense choice against Serbia. While it was a good mix up, and we did fool them, they were still able to recover and force OT with us, causing us to sweat a little bit en route to a 4 pt win. I would have selected an Inside Isolation offense in that Scenario.

Additionally we did not select a patient offense at all last season. While we didn't have a complete patient player, it would have been an ok offense to run against a lesser team in order to add mystery to our tactical approaches.

I believe Winston Pham would have been a good early call up for a potential motion offense against nigeria. Or even a motion offense. Enrique benavides never truly got his opportunity to play either. Those two were the only under-utilized in my opinion. Although all the other players used were used well, so I suppose someone had to lose haha.

Question for the 2 leading candidates others maybe advise to answer this question but this is mainly for the 2 leading candidates right now. If I have to point them out I will. Teemo and Deucie.

The question is what will you do towards the disconnect of tanking to get under 21 players and mediocre members aligning towards established members of the USA federation of the national teams. Obviously BB has tried really hard to fix this problem but we need people like Deucie and Teemo to fix this problem themselves.