BuzzerBeater Forums

.
But then we see his listing price now: Starting Price: $ 188 888
!

$1 starting Price for all auctions.

Mama, there goes that man.

You better not tell me, what I do or don't understand, okay?

Did you have another team before and quit once then come back??

Exactly, this was my first team (41913). But as far as I know Austria was always hovering around 100-120 users.

If I remember correctly I startet in DIV III, promoted like two days later, got my ass whooped in DIV II, demoted again ruled DIV III, and then started to take over DIV II and subsequently DIV I.

Ragequit out of boredom and frustration when I was in DIV I, just when I got strong enough to win it all.



Last edited by Knecht at 2/9/2015 4:29:20 AM

The biggest thing for me is the massive inflation price of young players (as I think was mentioned earlier in the thread?)
One way to curb that would be to start all u21 listings at $1? Or all players under a certain number of skill points?

This would mean no ridiculous listings for young players just because of potential and would also increase interest in the market as people would look out for bargains.

Obviously incredible draftees would still go for millions because (as we've all seen) whatever price a player is listed for, if they are good enough they will sell for loads.

The biggest thing for me is the massive inflation price of young players (as I think was mentioned earlier in the thread?) One way to curb that would be to start all u21 listings at $1? Or all players under a certain number of skill points?

Unfortunately, that would have no effect. Just as much excess money would still be chasing too few players. That's the root of inflation.

I think limiting the amount of player than can come into a team at the time roster cuts should be implemented to (12) out side that roster should injured reserved roster up t 2 players which can not be sold (14 players) . BB will need to fix thing this so team can bypass the bb draft . Give teams the control over that, not shove players on them every year.

BB draft should be a bought thing not a manditory right. How does help stop the flipping player for insane amount. its takes the bullets out the chambers every season. If they have not invested in draft, why give them free players to sell for profit.??

Install the Larry Bird rule or we can re-name it "the free bird rule" a player bought/purchased over certain amount of money is considered franchise and can not be traded until 3 season time. Not only does hurt the flipper with selling low, current rules kick in so they get nothing in these sales. Its help training players.


In Manon example a 19 was worth 8k and sold , was placed 188k up front in day.. that player should get a franchise tag. he can not be sold in 3 seasons time. If the manager fire this player they get with a 188K fine. which is the player worth he was paid to play for him..

if possible Tweek team chemistry somewhat. if new players are being bought it hurt team moral somewhat , the more going in and out the more team confusion . The more bad play in games the less fan buy merchandise and come because the new players are not playing .


Last edited by Mr. Glass at 2/12/2015 3:51:37 PM

Paragraph by paragraph in your post ...

1. Are you suggesting a roster limit of 12, plus two injured reserve spots? That would be an awful idea.
2. Are you suggesting that if a manager does not invest in scouting he shouldn't get any players in the draft? Part of the fundamental economic problem in BB is too much money chasing too few players. Your suggestion would make matters worse by reducing the players in the system.
3. Your "free bird rule" hamstrings a manager who buys a player for legitimate purposes, but does nothing to hurt the seller. Very backwards.
4. Same objection as #3.
5. Your suggestion is the same as what is already done (although not very smoothly) by the Fan Survey. Better to improve the Fan Survey, eh?