BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Reporting and cheating.

Reporting and cheating.

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
84016.7 in reply to 84016.5
Date: 4/1/2009 10:57:22 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
Because?

This Post:
00
84016.8 in reply to 84016.7
Date: 4/1/2009 11:15:22 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
587587
Sorry, I thought it was obvious. It's part of the no public court sessions rule.

This is a personal comment with no GM hat:
This rule keeps things simple. You don't accuse anyone, so you don't get accused for no reason either. The alternative wouldn't be pretty and there would be more work for the GM's.

This Post:
00
84016.10 in reply to 84016.8
Date: 4/1/2009 11:28:54 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
So basically this applyes in the US correct? There is no way the public can actually punish the cheater. They can discuss the case in the forum report it and then let the GM handle it. The other way to avoid discussions and keep people reporting is to give feedback if the reported user has been fined. I do not understand why is that info classified? Why protect the villain?

This Post:
00
84016.11 in reply to 84016.9
Date: 4/1/2009 11:32:40 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
Do you actually believe that all cheaters get reported??? We can not report most of the above value transfers because we can not see the estimated range after the deal has gone through. Perhaps you feel there are a lot of reports because there are 50 GM's total to deal with what? about 45k users?

This Post:
00
84016.13 in reply to 84016.12
Date: 4/1/2009 12:12:28 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
That was the additon point to the first sentence you quoted.

This Post:
00
84016.14 in reply to 84016.10
Date: 4/1/2009 3:30:50 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
587587
So basically this applyes in the US correct?

No, BuzzerBeater.

They can discuss the case in the forum report it and then let the GM handle it.

No discussion in the forum.

This Post:
00
84016.15 in reply to 84016.6
Date: 4/1/2009 6:04:03 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
304304
Because people are saying they do not bother reporting any more because they see no feedback and the teams in question still keep their etc.


Not all cheating allegations are true.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
From: Heathcoat

This Post:
00
84016.16 in reply to 84016.11
Date: 4/2/2009 1:11:25 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
I dont think open accusations is the answer. Just because you believe someone is cheating doesnt mean they are, and it certainly cant be allowed to smear someones name everytime they fetch a solid price for a transfer. I can almost guarantee that a post of accusations about various cheating wont be as informative as it will be inflammatory. You are more likely to show users various ways of skirting the rules than you are of gaining an advantage knowing someone in your series is getting away with something.

Report suspicious behavior and have faith.

This Post:
00
84016.17 in reply to 84016.15
Date: 4/2/2009 3:53:12 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
True, but when you punish someone why not give feedback to reporter(s) or leave a mark in the transactions page or whereever. It could be removed after a season has passed etc. I just don't get the fact that you keep protecting the guys who cheat. I can understand that for the managers sake, before the "trial" you want them to have a "clean" name but why not make the name public after he has been "convicted"?

Advertisement