so this season i looked at all the skills of all the draft players in my draft and i must say the difference between A+ and A- are the only salary.
This is not correct.
Even in this small data set A+ has average of 57.8 TSP; and A- has average 55, which is lower. It might be exception also and the actual difference might be higher than 2.8 TSP.
Grades A- A A+ and others reflect player salaries. The higher the skills the higher the salaries are, simple logic. I agree the A-, hell even B- might be better player than some A+, but it is very hard to imagine player A- having like 65 skillspoints, it must be very specific skillsets; while A+ is totally doable. It is like saying dont look at card while playing poker, you havent to fold if you have been dealt with 2-2; you can still hit 4 kind agains like 3 kings lol. It is possible, but improbable.
I had my dataset back in season 9-18 or something; A+ had ~46-47 TSP average while A- had 37. Now the skillspoints are inflated, but tendency shall remain. The higher TSP the higher the overall in overall. Sure it might be exceptions like for Centers, they can be trees or SF's they can be heavily shot and RB based ones.
But players have correlation on their listed position and "tree-iness". It is usually very high tsp if low plyer is listed at center or pf and tall as pg.
Last edited by Vilkai [LTU NT] at 8/11/2019 5:27:50 AM