BuzzerBeater Forums

USA - III.6 > Prices

Prices

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Jesus2012

This Post:
00
277705.5 in reply to 277705.4
Date: 3/1/2016 2:31:22 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
55
The BB lingo you are using is going over my head haha. I know tsp but TL and PAS?

From: Calum

This Post:
00
277705.6 in reply to 277705.5
Date: 3/1/2016 2:33:49 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
394394
Haha, sorry:
TL = transfer list
PAS = perennial allstar - 115 was conservative, more like 125.

From: Jesus2012

This Post:
00
277705.7 in reply to 277705.6
Date: 3/1/2016 2:41:18 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
55
Is it worth investing in trainers above the advanced level? I see the really high ones go for ridiculous costs. I just feel stuck I basically have a phobia of making poor financial decisions in this game (indicative of my real life personality) so I end up frozen on decisions for transfer players and just end up hoarding cash. I'd spend that money on a great trainer but I'm not sure how much better it is

This Post:
00
277705.8 in reply to 277705.7
Date: 3/1/2016 3:19:45 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9898
I've read posts where people really broke down training speeds. The gist of them I think was that most people would be pretty surprised how little the difference can be. Managing your training minutes and picking good trainees are far more important. On the other hand, if you're good at managing that stuff or if you're trying to train a really special player they can be worthwhile. The biggest difference I think was that with a better coach you'll see better results especially with training players who are getting into their mid 20s. I blew some really stupid amounts of money on staff in early seasons. I scaled way back for a very long time, and just recently got a new monster coach. What changed in my reckoning was that I splurged on some young guys when I noticed how expensive really strong players are. I have enough money to compete economically in the divisions I've been in, but I just can't compete in the transfer market with these mostly non-U.S. based teams. BB put a tax on money hoarders this season, but I don't think it even kicks in until 25 million saved. That they even made that rule means there are some teams with enough cash to control the market.

Message deleted
From: Calum

This Post:
00
277705.10 in reply to 277705.7
Date: 3/1/2016 9:48:16 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
394394
The short answer is no. Not worth it. Only exception is if you're training an elite prospect which is almost never the case. I've never used greater than advanced until veey recently - for cliff duncan which has all been offset by his 2 week injury!

From: Calum

This Post:
00
277705.12 in reply to 277705.11
Date: 3/12/2016 10:24:49 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
394394
Ouch. I guess it bodes well for you! Can't happen like that again right? :S

I'm just annoyed as my trainee only got 46 mins...

This Post:
00
277705.13 in reply to 277705.3
Date: 3/14/2016 5:36:20 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
99
Just to put in my 2 cents I believe in trianing hi potential players MVP or better. Just looked at this set up on the transfer list and found a lot of great players age 21 max, current bid 1 mil max, potential superstar min, really a lot of great trainable players in one season these can be great player give it a look and see. check out my second team lots of good young MVP players they train very quickly

This Post:
00
277705.14 in reply to 277705.13
Date: 3/16/2016 2:38:17 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
394394
I would disagree that this is the most cost-effective approach. Sure, if you can afford it it's great, but the trainees you're picking up at MVP potential under $1m (<70 TSP at 21) are far worse of an investment than paying a similar price for a >50 TSP 18 yo PA/SS. Or better yet, a >60 TSP 19 yo.

Chances are you'll never reach cap of that MVP training the best-return (SF).

This Post:
00
277705.15 in reply to 277705.11
Date: 3/22/2016 2:31:32 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9898
Rough week.

Advertisement