BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > TV games this season

TV games this season

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
14773.5 in reply to 14773.4
Date: 2/1/2008 8:55:34 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
i have 1 question for tv match ... does i get money and if i play away game??

This Post:
00
14773.6 in reply to 14773.5
Date: 2/1/2008 9:03:02 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Ofcourse. Both teams get the same amount. Only the hometeam gets their revenue on top of that ofcourse.

This Post:
00
14773.7 in reply to 14773.6
Date: 2/1/2008 9:04:47 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
ok ... thanks m8 for answer ... !

This Post:
00
14773.8 in reply to 14773.7
Date: 2/1/2008 9:05:40 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Don't mention it. :)

This Post:
00
14773.9 in reply to 14773.5
Date: 2/2/2008 5:41:12 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
44
Since you just started a few weeks ago, something to watch out for is that the TV games pay a lot more money than you get from ticket sales. Last season, I would lose a little bit each week, and then recover it all with the TV money.

This Post:
00
14773.11 in reply to 14773.10
Date: 2/2/2008 9:26:16 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
304304
Speaking of which (again), we should be able to go into debt to bid on players....


This was brought up before, and the BB answer was (and which I agree with) is that no matter what, there's going to be a concrete line of how much money you can spend, and there's no real point to make that line more than what you have to begin with.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
14773.12 in reply to 14773.11
Date: 2/3/2008 2:50:00 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
Speaking of which (again), we should be able to go into debt to bid on players....


This was brought up before, and the BB answer was (and which I agree with) is that no matter what, there's going to be a concrete line of how much money you can spend, and there's no real point to make that line more than what you have to begin with.


Then why have a cut off line at $500k??

If this is a basketball / economic simulator we should be able to decide if we go into debt (and pay the prevailing interest on the debt) or just have the line set at 0... you go into minus we terminate your position as manager.

Regarding transfers.. with the new fees it would make more sense to buy a player that takes you into the minus then list... otherwise you have to list... then if you dont get the player you wanted to bid for you have to buy back your own and pay the fees (lets not get started on listing within the playoff period and then if player doesnt sell he also becomes ineligible!!) ha that is the one rule that made me chuckle out loud when someone reported it...




This Post:
00
14773.13 in reply to 14773.12
Date: 2/3/2008 7:39:32 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
304304
Then why have a cut off line at $500k??


Going into debt because of expenses you must pay is different than going into debt for something extra you're trying to purchase, in my eyes.


NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
14773.14 in reply to 14773.13
Date: 2/3/2008 7:52:32 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
9696
again only 1 rule applies here.

players should adapt to the rules that are set.
Rules should not be adapted to any players' needs.

If a vast majority of players finds that adaption will (strongly) improve the gameplay, then changing rules might be considered. This is clearly no such case, since most who will want to spend a large amount on a good player know they will have to wait until they have the money available instead of buying on credit.
Do not worry, in a few weks, when you have the money probably an even better player will show up... Buying a star on the TL is not a 1-time opportunity.

They are not your friends; they dispise you. I am the only one you can count on. Trust me.
This Post:
00
14773.15 in reply to 14773.14
Date: 2/3/2008 8:22:36 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
the point is I guess the limit has been set below for those that are either careless or misjudge their economic position.

so if it is a limit there to help those that perhaps arent wonderful when it comes to managing their funds within their means - surely managers that can plan ahead more effectively / efficiently (and more importantly within the parameters set) should be able to do so (and be rewarded for it)