BuzzerBeater Forums

Total training for your team will be higher in two position training than in one position training. So it depends what you want, train 3 players as fast as possible or more players slower.

This is only true if you are getting 6 players 48 minutes, which is hard to do if you want to be competitive. It is much easier to get 3 players 48 minutes and single position train. I think the total training is greater single position training 3 players than 2 position training 5 players.

yea. the problem is i can't train 3 players fast as possible for jump shooting.

I really depends on how you want to develop your team, at least this is how I see it. I have just recently switched from 1 position training to 2 position training.

1 position training I tend to like more in a market of declining transfer prices. When you train 2 pos. then the skill increases might be offset be lower prices. 1-pos training will give you a player that you can sell with a profit. However, the players you dont train will decline in value.

Apart from this I find it easier to have the minutes distribution close to optimal for 2-position training. I usually have no problem having 5 trainees with 48 minutes and one 30+. In 1-pos training I often ended up with 2 48 minutes and 1 30+. If this is the case then 2 position training is a lot more efficient.

2-position training will give you more depth on your roster, and will keep salary cost a bit lower as well.

I also find that it is easier to train one player out of position in a 2-pos. training regimen.

And finally it is easier to fit the 2-position training skills into you training (eg. JR)

Last edited by Blacksword at 4/4/2010 7:24:29 AM