BuzzerBeater Forums

I've got all my data at my studios. Yes because of B3 people use stats. You can not use one or the other that is my reckon.

I think the equation goes. You can't make a competitive spread team if you chose gameshape and DMI.

You have:
1 player at proficient GS
0 players at strong GS
4 players at respectable GS
10 players at average GS

So i would say that your team is not ready. And to show how your team performs i can illustrate it by posting one of my players that has a salary of $ 5900. He has higher DMI then your player with thee highest DMI. So he will perform better then the 24k salary player you have got. But cost 19k less.
Thats what low GS does to your team.


Tijane Diabira (38301982)

Weekly salary: $ 5 955
DMI: 92000
Game Shape: proficient

Jump Shot: proficient Jump Range: inept
Outside Def.: prominent Handling: respectable
Driving: strong Passing: average
Inside Shot: strong Inside Def.: strong
Rebounding: average Shot Blocking: atrocious
Stamina: respectable Free Throw: prominent

Experience: average TSP: 67 (44 + 23)

Evencio Brantuas (33526821)

Weekly salary: $ 24 204
DMI: 85400
Game Shape: average


I really dont know why i bother though. I bet you got some data on some old computer that doesnt work that says low GS is better then high.

While I can appreciate where you come from I actually gotta disagree that the less experienced, lower TSP player will perform better. He will play "harder" he will play 'smarter' but I would still expect the better established player to lend more gravity to the proceedings. Now Manon's line of thought can be better substantiated. But wardoyt has a point as well, as the old saying goes 'talent wins out'


DMI and GS are in my book part of the "mental" aspect. On the 'wall' in the Generals locker room is a sign

Determination
Motivation
Intensity

DETERMINATION: is your player 'focused' is his 'mind right'? What are the stakes? I don't know about y'all but seems to me that between two teams practically equal that the one further up the food chain will have better DMI,

MOTIVATION, is he being used correctly? Does he want to be there? And I see that a lot when I upgrade a player and the guy who's job he took will start to consistently see a drop in his DMI because when you go from a starter to a substitute it does stay harder to be motivated. And conversely a player being well guided thru the training ranks will have a strong number because they are trying to prove themselves. And in wards case he either plays his guys too much or not at all and that affects his number but for completely different reasons. The guy getting too many minutes wears from the grind, the guy without enough gets stale and rusty.

Intensity: is it a rivalry week, playoffs, big cup game? Or what are the stakes.

You know, I think I could put these attributes under any of those headings and my theory would have weight. But if all variables were equal I would still expect a little more out of waddos guy statistically but I would not be surprised if Manon's graded out better

I've got all my data at my studios. Yes because of B3 people use stats. You can not use one or the other that is my reckon.

where is the day of your reckon please talk my answer fast. you speak as you are the owner of the true.

Because that means that gameshape and DMI is invalid for casual players that doesn't want to complete the game but is the main target for buzzer beater best interest. I personally believe that gameshape and DMI don't matter because of in game variables and intaingables.

7 minutes till and its gonna be a grudge match. Found some exploits and am running a hybird.

My Australian cousin was here and the fog set in the odds are in my favor everything is looking good the only problem is game shape.

By tells I see that the odds are now starting to kick in.

By tells I see that the odds are now starting to kick in.

Congrats to Cash City on becoming S43 Champs.

Also props to Java for MVP honors.


Last edited by Mixx at 10/22/2018 2:07:01 AM