BuzzerBeater Forums

Where exactly are you going with this, and have you read this post carefully or just skimmed through. I never sad anything of sorts. I did say that I don't believe that I ever heard of the age related slowdown effecting different skills differently, but as far as I know that happens to be the truth. And while we are on the subject there are situations when the slowdown related to a runaway skill just can't be avoided and you just have to live with it. I am not about to stop training OD for example just because the other skills are lagging. Sometimes you can avoid it by rotating your training, but sometimes it is what it is and you just have to deal with it.

And while we are on the subject there are situations when the slowdown related to a runaway skill just can't be avoided and you just have to live with it. I am not about to stop training OD for example just because the other skills are lagging.

You'll probably end up with sub-optimal training for it - it really does slow down when you get out of balance.

Just by how much would you say it slows down? I plan on tacking OD to about 17-18 while the HN and DR will stay at around 12-13. Will I have significant problems doing that? I do plan on doing quite a bit of one position training were OD is concerned.

Just by how much would you say it slows down? I plan on tacking OD to about 17-18 while the HN and DR will stay at around 12-13. Will I have significant problems doing that? I do plan on doing quite a bit of one position training were OD is concerned.

I believe it would slow down enough to make the last couple pops a real drag.

Ok, thanks. I will keep it in mind. I wasn't sure if I wanted to archive those last pop or two through pressure training or handling, but I guess what you say reassures me that I might need to do some handling training late. By the way how is the OD going to be effected by the fact that it is a runaway skill in terms of secondary training. Will training it indirectly still produce a diminishing return?

Will training it indirectly still produce a diminishing return?

Probably, but not enough to be entirely concerned about it.

Ok. Thanks a lot for the info. Sounds like that is how I will approach it then.

Well, I am not quite used to this Buzzer Beater system because I am new. However, from what it seems so far, players's jumprange from mediocre-respectable is nota big factor when you play in tactics that they can't really shoot the outside balls. For example, in the Princeton offense, my SF/PF was the one that was shooting and making the 3's (5-6 exactually). On the other hand, my guards, not just SG, took about 2 each in average. Whiles making 50 percent of it. in the Motion offense my guards attemptedabout 5 tp 7 threes each. Wjiles making 25 percent of them my point of view is, when you train your team in Jumprange, it is not going to be a factor when you play them in a tactic that does not empower them to take advantage of their talent.

I stick with Jumpshot over Jumprange. When I study my opponents's players and notice that their SG or SF does not not have good outside defense, that is when I may set the training to jumprange.

this could have the reason, that the opposition of the c is much weaker normally JR matters with Princeton(also and motion) heavily on the position 1 to 3. But the system is also looking for the best shooting abilitiy, so when your player can not throw the ball, he would normally shoot less and not with a much weaker percentage.