BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > NEW - Top Priority is ?

NEW - Top Priority is ?

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
264729.329 in reply to 264729.1
Date: 1/26/2015 4:02:29 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
370370
Poll: What should be the biggest (most immediate) priority for the use of resources, that will have the most positive impact on this great game?

With regard to the choices listed, I choose "None of the Above."

Training needs to be overhauled above all other things, imo. Smaller changes in other things can go on meanwhile, but the most important focus should be a simple, logical system of training.

This Post:
00
264729.330 in reply to 264729.328
Date: 2/12/2015 8:54:34 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
14901490
Ok if you have the time to start a new poll, I'd like to see what the sentiment is now.

They gave people more flexibility on training which is nice despite selected individual(s) campaigning more and more vehemently for more changes, they removed blanks and it's pretty clear there is no plan for an app yet.

I'm pretty sure that if you redo the poll, subs flexibility and control will come in second after the app, perhaps even contending for first.

This Post:
00
264729.332 in reply to 264729.331
Date: 2/12/2015 11:36:27 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
14901490
I wouldn't open the "lack of realism" door...besides the lack of realism in this case is not the offense, but the fact that defensive tactics are not flexible enough to cope, thus creating a massive mismatch.

This Post:
00
264729.334 in reply to 264729.333
Date: 2/12/2015 3:18:14 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
14901490
Would that be the opinion of the people participating in the forums and what they want in the game or things who could really impact the future of BB in terms of numbers and newcomers retaining ?
Yes it would affect user retention both new and old. I've never used blanks, but I understand the complaining. Most people are complaining not because they removed blanks and they are not able to decide for themselves, but because blanks/LCD provided by far the most efficient minute allocation

Because like removing BLU, I doubt that the majority know or care about subs flexibility.
I disagree. If you remember in the BLU option Sid added extra flexibility on subs because there were several people who raised the point in the first thread.

This Post:
00
264729.337 in reply to 264729.335
Date: 2/12/2015 6:20:23 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
14901490
well you were the first whom I've seen using the acronym. I personally don't care about the removal of blank lineups, but the issue of minute distribution is a problem for many, be it for training or GS management.

This Post:
11
264729.339 in reply to 264729.338
Date: 2/12/2015 6:41:25 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
14901490
Look, I don't think people have a problem because blanks are gone. Even those who don't know what blank line up was, will tell you minute allocation as it is isn't ideal as soon as they understand how GS works.

So yeah, I believe that several of those who voted for removing blanks + improving substitution patterns will still vote for improving substitution patterns. Plus many of those who lost a tool to manage their minutes more effectively will also vote the same option.

There was no addition by subtraction in removing blanks. There was only subtraction. Efficient subs management was only available with that option and now it's gone, unfortunately.

Advertisement