BuzzerBeater Forums

BB USA > U21 National Team Debate Thread

U21 National Team Debate Thread (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
From: fury508
This Post:
11
304508.22 in reply to 304508.21
Date: 06/05/2020 18:40:54
Wilmington Tiger Sharks
III.10
Overall Posts Rated:
168168
Second Team:
Waipahu Fighting Cocks
How well-versed are you on your current competitors' rosters and tactics, and how much of a staff of advisors will you have available for war-gaming, scouting, and game-planning?




From: fury508
This Post:
00
304508.23 in reply to 304508.22
Date: 06/07/2020 22:24:45
Wilmington Tiger Sharks
III.10
Overall Posts Rated:
168168
Second Team:
Waipahu Fighting Cocks
Crickets. Its all good lol. My votes in.

This Post:
11
304508.24 in reply to 304508.22
Date: 06/08/2020 11:39:52
LionPride
IV.11
Overall Posts Rated:
246246
Second Team:
TerrapinPride
Ha, completely missed this.

It’s too early beyond a single prospect here or there looking nice for worlds, but for continentals there’s a greater picture:

Bolivia, Barbados, Panama, and Mexico- I’m pretty sure we could play only 3 guys and still win big. All together, those squads have 5 guys above 10k on their rosters, though Mexico’s is still incomplete.

Canada- down year for Canada. I like Columbia’s team more this season. A very talented Center, and a few decent PFs. Not much else.

Columbia- have a couple of nasty big men. A 65k Center is always going to give any u21 team fits. Not a lot of depth, not a lot of talented guards. Should still win easily.


I love using other users for advice on game planning, tactics, scouting, opposition tracking; all of it. The more eyes on the goal, the better. It makes users invested, which makes them want to train better players. The owners of these players know more about their players than I do. Maybe, for whatever reason, they don’t perform as well as you’d expect in this offense. It’s all nice to know, even if you don’t utilise everything.