BuzzerBeater Forums

(45611112)

Kharkov 's loss was based on luck as well. Loads. Way more than my game. Though they used different defensive tactics still the pp's are on fire. should be a game with 20points of difference .

Metallist Kharkov - 173 bbstats
Massendefekt 67 - 176 bbstats

It is hard to believe that team with better bbstats wins only because of luck ;-)
Massendefekt had better rebounds and, offensive flow. Inside attack was the same (compared to inside defence - exactly one level higher than inside defence of opponents). Metallist had advantage only in outside attack (compared to outside defence), but both teams played inside tactic so it wasn't decisive.

Last edited by B.B.King at 4/19/2012 6:36:20 AM

Man your team is not so good if u loose the game on neutral court, period. Believing in luck is not the right thing in this game. Game engine based on huge amount of formulas, all of which we can't know for sure.
Btw, I was betting on your team.. I was thinking that your all around team is better, but I was wrong, just like you

Yes , unlucky this time. More fouls . Bad luck on PG position .

On a completely unrelated note. I've once again forgotten where to get those bbstats #'s, could anyone link me to it?

Last edited by Eminence Front at 4/19/2012 7:15:43 AM

You miss some point with your analysys, on one hand i was lucky to lose my starting guard at the begin of the second quarter, so that i played basically with the same lineup against his team like i did in my 30 point win(45458066) earlier this season(i know homecourt and his better gameshape). Also to the pp there is a different in shot distribution to be considered, which is a bit hard with LCD and blank lineup but i had 13 more possesion with a shot/free throw and looking at the first game the rebounding could be even lucky for him. I will not say it isn't lucky, but imho this game was a coinflip which means there had to be one lucky and a unlucky guy.(and i am pretty sure that i win at least 4 of 10 matches, since i can compensate foul trouble better and his star C is fouling a lot had to nearly 48 min)

Also you miss that i had lot more possesion then him, maybe through luck of clock management but i believe mostly through not shown rebounds.

Also implying Dionysys is a bad manager, who just bought* the title and then getting the answer on court while he was beating you with a much cheaper roster. And i don't think that his roster is that bad, as you imply ;)

* and he managed to get the money, in probadly the most competive league here. And didn't have the advantage of playing in a league which he can dominate8also with a much more expensiv) roster, where he can play his C always out of position without getting punished economical.

Last edited by CrazyEye at 4/19/2012 7:25:09 AM

I'm not sure it's official name of this stats, but I count it as below:

atrocious low = 1
atrocious medium = 2
atrocious high = 3
pitiful low = 4
...
legendary high = 60

And final result is sum of all six ratings (OS+IS+OD+ID+RB+OF).

You forgot that you had more enthusiasm in that game in preliminary. ) I made some changes in rotation - they did not work as I eхpected . It also seams that injuery only helped you to find best mismatch ))

i wish that some day only cool poeple play that game and not so much pussys..all that whinin about luck and the engine is really girlish and unfunny!!

why u guys didnt take a loss like a man and wrote something like screw u, next time i will spank ur skinny ass bla bla bla

all that excuses r sooooooooooo lame!!

Cheers bitches