BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Max training players

Max training players

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
51340.13 in reply to 51340.12
Date: 9/26/2008 5:07:36 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
304304
there is also the theorie that training look like a sigmoid, in this case it could be less then 5% ;)


That theory is incorrect.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
51340.14 in reply to 51340.13
Date: 9/26/2008 5:31:53 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
is your 8% theory, for sure?

For me it is a bit to high.

This Post:
00
51340.15 in reply to 51340.3
Date: 9/30/2008 9:02:49 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Thanks for the advice everyone, I will sell 2 and cut it to 6...that seems to be the most efficient way.

If you can play 3 games a week and keep a true rotation, such as this, you can get 48 minutes for each, or close to it:

1st pair START PF/C
2nd pair BACKUP

2nd pair START PF/C
3rd pair BACKUP

3rd pair START PF/C
1st pair BACKUP

This Post:
00
51340.16 in reply to 51340.13
Date: 10/1/2008 3:50:37 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
137137
there is also the theorie that training look like a sigmoid, in this case it could be less then 5% ;)


That theory is incorrect.


I guess this is what I find vexing...if nobody knows what the training curve looks like (other than the BBs) and nobody can present hard data, who can we say anything is right or wrong or how it might be? Seems like everybody is just giving their opinions or hunches based on very limited training data.

Steve

This Post:
00
51340.17 in reply to 51340.16
Date: 10/1/2008 4:40:23 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
304304
there is also the theorie that training look like a sigmoid, in this case it could be less then 5% ;)


That theory is incorrect.


I guess this is what I find vexing...if nobody knows what the training curve looks like (other than the BBs) and nobody can present hard data, who can we say anything is right or wrong or how it might be? Seems like everybody is just giving their opinions or hunches based on very limited training data.

Steve


This is based on what the BB team has stated - they're not releasing anything resembling hard data, but everything I've been told points to a big drop in training under 48 minutes.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
51340.18 in reply to 51340.17
Date: 10/1/2008 7:49:53 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
when i begin, i read something like the sigmoid thing, i suppose from a BB but maybe it was a gm(andwithout deeper view to the game) ... The middlepoint of the sigmoid ain't the 24 min mark, but a slightly start which get more dramatic with every next minute, make sense with the stuff the BB told in the official forums.

The prozentual theorie don't sound like something from the BB, because the decrease become smaller with every minute.

Last edited by CrazyEye at 10/1/2008 7:51:14 PM