1) The US u21 prospects will fall to a variety of managers as many of you whom have filled the role of scout or u21 manager have done in the past. This isn't something that is very fixable, it is just something that has to be managable in my view as a former u21 manager. What approach do you take as the u21 manager, and what approach do you delegate to scouts, when it comes to multiple different types of owners? I won't qualify a response for my vote if you answer with something about how you are going to get those owners to commit more to your strategy by being more active. And yes, i am voting and have not yet decided.
Many prospects are best suited to following a fairly straightforward and established routine of training in order to maximize their chances of being useful to the U21 squad. For these cases, I would rely on the group of U21 scouts to provide an outline for those who need it and to return with the results of their communication with these managers. If there are managers with unusual ideas or prospects that require specialized builds to have a chance at success, I will do my best to offer my honest advice on a case-by-case basis. The same goes for any particularly promising prospects.
I do not expect to be able to make anybody follow advice or training plans. I will give suggestions for targets, as well as plans for reaching them. If a manager decides to go a different way, I will work with them as best I can to see if we can come up with something that works both them and the team. If not, I'll wish them the best, make myself available for future advice, and move on to focus more compatible prospects.
2) The US u21 team in general is typically somewhere between 3rd and 5th best in terms of total primary ratings it can achieve compared to the rest of the worlds group. 3rd falls in line with the population for the US in comparison to other countries, and 5th falls in line with probably where we stand in terms of having interest in our national team. Therefore, the minimum expectations is that a semi's birth occurs from the u21 efforts each season (whether or not it is fair for that given season). What measure do the u21 managers have in place for improving the performance we had last season to the point where we can get that result at minimum again.
I understand the expectation that the team should be competitive each season and will do my best to evaluate the specific strengths and weaknesses of each talent pool on it's own merits in order to come up with the best suited strategy as we go. Given the sometimes...mercurial nature of GS management and injuries in this game, I expect that there will be a fair number of wrenches thrown into the works throughout any season, and I believe that I am good at adapting to available resources on the fly. I'll plan for a best case scenario, while trying to have a viable backup plan in mind each week.
3) Do you believe in primary-oriented players or do you believe in secondaries? I don't plan on deciding on voting based on the response to this, just kinda wanted a feel for what the tipping point was mentally.
I think that it's pretty much always true that more secondaries is always preferable, but I can't remember ever seeing a talent pool that had the luxury of ignoring primary-oriented players on a regular basis. Given the limited amount of time available to train U21 players, there's only so much secondary training you can do without leaving primaries below a usable level. So, assuming similar primary levels, I'd certainly give preference to the player with better secondaries, but I don't expect to have the luxury of extreme pickiness.