BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Lack of Engagement

Lack of Engagement

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
267983.12 in reply to 267983.10
Date: 2/24/2015 11:58:40 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
14901490
Ok Perpete, my stance is clear. I do not think you should impose games on everyone.

1) not give a bigger advantage to Supporters
I'm not saying it should be without limits. Is the supporters' perceived advantage at the moment that they can gather more data on how the GE works based on Private League games? I'm not a Supporter and I think that's totally fair. If you make a poll on this, people will say no, because most of them are sore losers and think that very small advantages can actually impact success. I think the BBs should take a decision on that on their own. I know they are very wary about adding benefits for supporters, but let's be honest: is 3 times a week rather than one (if so you wish) such a big difference?

2) less risks of having delays in the games if less games.
Ok. This is fair and if it is a problem, nothing can be done about it.

Last edited by Lemonshine at 2/24/2015 12:04:41 PM

This Post:
00
267983.14 in reply to 267983.13
Date: 2/25/2015 4:22:04 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
14901490
Rec'd for truth.

This Post:
22
267983.15 in reply to 267983.14
Date: 2/28/2015 3:14:22 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
197197
the pace of bb is ok, it's an online game to be played in the long run. being somewhat slow, it also means that if you are unable to login for a couple of days you won't screw your team up forever. the only thing i think should be tweaked is the offseason, sometimes you get 2 weeks without much going on and this is not cool even if you are used to it and are playing your 10th season or so. i wonder how many managers let BB go in the first weeks because they create their accounts during the offseason and their teams are idle... in the beginning you want action, if you don't get that it's easy to demotivate.