BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > ID-SB

ID-SB

Set priority
Show messages by
From: rigno

This Post:
22
271644.116 in reply to 271644.112
Date: 7/31/2015 5:57:46 AM
Sea Urchins
Serie A
Overall Posts Rated:
6363
Playing as PG shouldn't be big problem because he can play in defence on different position.
When player is great in defence and weak in attack it will be work only if his profits in defence is higher than his loss in attack. I doubt you have enough compensation. You want to reduced opponent's attack to 4 players but you set only 4 players in your own attack. So you need to fight to retrieve something what you gave up without fight.

Good point. But...

An élite defender like Haek guards the first offensive opponent option. A weak scorer like Haek is the last offensive option of his team: in fact he tends to pass the ball instead of try to find the basket.
Opponent's team has 4 other options, but not the best 4 and Haek's team has 4 other options but the best 4.

From: Robard

This Post:
66
271644.117 in reply to 271644.114
Date: 7/31/2015 8:07:49 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
301301
Every important tittle in BB was won without SB. And there is no single example with SB. It is fact.


Indeed.

Did you know that all important races where won by horses in 1890 and none by cars?
Did not prevent people to start building better cars though, you probably wouldnt have done so ;)

Last edited by Robard at 7/31/2015 8:09:15 AM

This Post:
00
271644.118 in reply to 271644.109
Date: 7/31/2015 8:21:46 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
370370
That's all right. It's going right over several other heads as well. Don't worry about it.

I see Manon has backtracked. At least he seems to get it, even if he doesn't want to admit it.

This Post:
00
271644.119 in reply to 271644.111
Date: 7/31/2015 8:31:55 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
370370
Still you are saying there is NO data.
Exactly. Not even any analysis, no hypothesis stated and tested, no comparing and contrasting of strategies, no controls of variables while other variables are tested ... just dogged opinion.

But the scaling works for me.
And at the lower levels, so would numerous other strategies, probably even many of them better than scaling down from D1/B3. That's what I've been saying all along. And people come on and argue with me, saying that many different approaches would work at the lower levels. I have to wonder if any of them ever noticed that they are saying the same thing I am. I have to wonder if they stop reading at "Mike Franks" and start arguing at that very moment. Even a couple of guys who I have seen write intelligently in the forums have done that here.

Last edited by Mike Franks at 7/31/2015 8:32:42 AM

From: B.B.King

This Post:
00
271644.121 in reply to 271644.120
Date: 7/31/2015 9:57:30 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
12061206
It wasn't accusation, it was possible explanation. Maybe you won few games because you have more expensive guards (and maybe even whole payroll), not because of SB of bigs.

This Post:
00
271644.125 in reply to 271644.124
Date: 7/31/2015 12:14:56 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
370370
SO let's summarize (what I hear you saying in your last post)
Don't bother, you didn't get any of it right.

LOL, you're so predictable.

Advertisement