BuzzerBeater Forums

Did you have another team before and quit once then come back??

Exactly, this was my first team (41913). But as far as I know Austria was always hovering around 100-120 users.

If I remember correctly I startet in DIV III, promoted like two days later, got my ass whooped in DIV II, demoted again ruled DIV III, and then started to take over DIV II and subsequently DIV I.

Ragequit out of boredom and frustration when I was in DIV I, just when I got strong enough to win it all.



Last edited by Knecht at 2/9/2015 4:29:20 AM

The biggest thing for me is the massive inflation price of young players (as I think was mentioned earlier in the thread?)
One way to curb that would be to start all u21 listings at $1? Or all players under a certain number of skill points?

This would mean no ridiculous listings for young players just because of potential and would also increase interest in the market as people would look out for bargains.

Obviously incredible draftees would still go for millions because (as we've all seen) whatever price a player is listed for, if they are good enough they will sell for loads.

The biggest thing for me is the massive inflation price of young players (as I think was mentioned earlier in the thread?) One way to curb that would be to start all u21 listings at $1? Or all players under a certain number of skill points?

Unfortunately, that would have no effect. Just as much excess money would still be chasing too few players. That's the root of inflation.

I think limiting the amount of player than can come into a team at the time roster cuts should be implemented to (12) out side that roster should injured reserved roster up t 2 players which can not be sold (14 players) . BB will need to fix thing this so team can bypass the bb draft . Give teams the control over that, not shove players on them every year.

BB draft should be a bought thing not a manditory right. How does help stop the flipping player for insane amount. its takes the bullets out the chambers every season. If they have not invested in draft, why give them free players to sell for profit.??

Install the Larry Bird rule or we can re-name it "the free bird rule" a player bought/purchased over certain amount of money is considered franchise and can not be traded until 3 season time. Not only does hurt the flipper with selling low, current rules kick in so they get nothing in these sales. Its help training players.


In Manon example a 19 was worth 8k and sold , was placed 188k up front in day.. that player should get a franchise tag. he can not be sold in 3 seasons time. If the manager fire this player they get with a 188K fine. which is the player worth he was paid to play for him..

if possible Tweek team chemistry somewhat. if new players are being bought it hurt team moral somewhat , the more going in and out the more team confusion . The more bad play in games the less fan buy merchandise and come because the new players are not playing .


Last edited by Mr. Glass at 2/12/2015 3:51:37 PM

Paragraph by paragraph in your post ...

1. Are you suggesting a roster limit of 12, plus two injured reserve spots? That would be an awful idea.
2. Are you suggesting that if a manager does not invest in scouting he shouldn't get any players in the draft? Part of the fundamental economic problem in BB is too much money chasing too few players. Your suggestion would make matters worse by reducing the players in the system.
3. Your "free bird rule" hamstrings a manager who buys a player for legitimate purposes, but does nothing to hurt the seller. Very backwards.
4. Same objection as #3.
5. Your suggestion is the same as what is already done (although not very smoothly) by the Fan Survey. Better to improve the Fan Survey, eh?

How is it awful a idea when all teamv have 2 side to choose from on the roster right now filling it up to 50 players. why does bb manager need 50 players to choose from.?? What reality come out of that? how is it helpful? what bb team you know need 50 players.??

10 man team.. 2 reserves.. no more than that. they still can train trainee. This also help finances, Stricter safer roster moves for all.


2.If player don't invest in BB draft they shouldn't get a player period .. you pay for everything else on the game even bb draft .. Why is BB giving teams a 3 free player to sell.. this is part of the problem. this promote the selling and not the building.

This will create cost effective team all across the boards to make them pay for the draft ,if they don't invest ,no new players.. This make market flippers more noticeable . If they don't want to do the draft, why force it on them, this also allows other who choose do it get a great pick. I don't need 3 new player wrecking my finanaces.. I don't want them on forced on my finances. Its build to sell, let them invest and build to sell.

3. Let them hurt. the market should be last resort type of thing. Not the stock market of mass money in flipping ., when The real stock market is a building through growth and extreme risk for investment and time? It harder to sell than to buy ,buying a is huge risk.. But on Bb it easier to do everything, its doesn't have to be built with any risk, too much free will/

f they buy a player at certain with high price they are stuck with it for 3 season. Let them build that 19 yrs, then sell him out at 23 for profit. which also improves this managers profit all across the board in more better manner for all. Is the game not about training. Was this player not bought to lead for the future of that team.. If BB start making teams stand behind the purchases. it would be a better game.

A BB player today is like the daily newspaper Bought in the morning &gone in the evening hours. If they bought a 250k player, BB franchise tag him. this will stop those flipper in the tracks. the game is about training right??

I said team chemistry not fan survey..

Last edited by Mr. Glass at 2/12/2015 9:22:07 PM

Wow, you really don't unerstand the inflated player market, do you? The best I can say is it is no surprise that a day trader wouldn't understand the market from a BB-sim point of view. The worst I can say is that your attempts at ad hominem attacks, as you usually do when you have no merit to your post, fell pretty flat this time.