The result of that loss however might be prety bad indeed. (to explain this: say you loose only 5% training when you wuold have your player play 45 minutes, which obviously isn't that much. However if this happens consistently, your player who started out equal to your opponents for example will at the end of the season be clearly less good and may cause you to loose your game.
there is also the theorie that training look like a sigmoid, in this case it could be less then 5% ;)
there is also the theorie that training look like a sigmoid, in this case it could be less then 5% ;)That theory is incorrect.
there is also the theorie that training look like a sigmoid, in this case it could be less then 5% ;)That theory is incorrect.I guess this is what I find vexing...if nobody knows what the training curve looks like (other than the BBs) and nobody can present hard data, who can we say anything is right or wrong or how it might be? Seems like everybody is just giving their opinions or hunches based on very limited training data.Steve