BuzzerBeater Forums

USA - III.6 > Prices

Prices

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Calum

This Post:
00
277705.10 in reply to 277705.7
Date: 3/1/2016 9:48:16 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
394394
The short answer is no. Not worth it. Only exception is if you're training an elite prospect which is almost never the case. I've never used greater than advanced until veey recently - for cliff duncan which has all been offset by his 2 week injury!

From: Calum

This Post:
00
277705.12 in reply to 277705.11
Date: 3/12/2016 10:24:49 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
394394
Ouch. I guess it bodes well for you! Can't happen like that again right? :S

I'm just annoyed as my trainee only got 46 mins...

This Post:
00
277705.13 in reply to 277705.3
Date: 3/14/2016 5:36:20 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
99
Just to put in my 2 cents I believe in trianing hi potential players MVP or better. Just looked at this set up on the transfer list and found a lot of great players age 21 max, current bid 1 mil max, potential superstar min, really a lot of great trainable players in one season these can be great player give it a look and see. check out my second team lots of good young MVP players they train very quickly

This Post:
00
277705.14 in reply to 277705.13
Date: 3/16/2016 2:38:17 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
394394
I would disagree that this is the most cost-effective approach. Sure, if you can afford it it's great, but the trainees you're picking up at MVP potential under $1m (<70 TSP at 21) are far worse of an investment than paying a similar price for a >50 TSP 18 yo PA/SS. Or better yet, a >60 TSP 19 yo.

Chances are you'll never reach cap of that MVP training the best-return (SF).

This Post:
00
277705.15 in reply to 277705.11
Date: 3/22/2016 2:31:32 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9898
Rough week.

From: Calum

This Post:
00
277705.16 in reply to 277705.11
Date: 3/23/2016 1:29:21 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
394394
Can you please play FCP against me? ;)