BuzzerBeater
BuzzerBeater Forums
Suggestions > Quarter Lineup reset
Back to the Sneak Peek
Suggestions
Player Skills
27
Fix the Clock!
15
External Match Viewer
4
what do i do?
5
scrimmage flag
2
search page
1
Scouting
5
Game time
5
Economy Page
2
Shot Blocking
1
Box score option
2
Logins
1
Forum Navigation
3
Uniform Colors
2
box score
2
PT options
4
Quarter Lineup reset
20
Same Team Name
10
League Forums
2
Known bugs?
4
<
>
Favorite Folders
Quarter Lineup reset
Set priority
High
Normal
Low
Show messages by
Everybody
BB-Mark (1)
Edju (4)
Vikman (2)
raonne (3)
Dr. Dr. Jàn Ïtor (3)
nickfox45 (6)
Bobos Playhouse (1)
Search this Thread (Supporter Feature)
From:
Bobos Playhouse
This Post:
0
1070.1
Date: 9/6/2007 2:51:46 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5
It seems to me - barring any injury or desperate foul trouble, the starting lineup should be back on the floor.
Maybe we could have the option to change tactics in the second half????
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
BB-Mark
To:
Bobos Playhouse
This Post:
0
1070.2
in reply to
1070.1
Date: 9/11/2007 9:05:23 PM
Molson Canadians
III.4
Overall Posts Rated:
91
Well, that's especially hard because the games are all preprocessed 15 minutes before the game "starts." We might add in a "coach" staff that you can hire who will make these decisions for you... in so doing, we hope the game will be a bit more customizable. I.e., perhaps you could tell the coach to "put in starters at the beginning of the second half." But this is all a concept for the far future, and we can't promise anything :-)
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
nickfox45
To:
BB-Mark
This Post:
0
1070.3
in reply to
1070.2
Date: 9/18/2007 4:20:53 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
0
I would agree that the default for each quarter (at the very least the half) should be that the starters are back on the floor? Isn't that how is it now?
Let coach decide is one thing, but I'd think that following the starting lineup should at least work for the first couple mins of each quarter/half.
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
nickfox45
To:
Dr. Dr. Jàn Ïtor
This Post:
0
1070.5
in reply to
1070.4
Date: 9/18/2007 5:16:03 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
0
I actually like let coach decide, why dont you?
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
raonne
To:
Dr. Dr. Jàn Ïtor
This Post:
0
1070.7
in reply to
1070.6
Date: 9/18/2007 2:34:35 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
16
I used to lead this movement (against LCD), but I will only support it again if they change SFDC completely, since when u use SFDC and u set up a good lineup, u dont get any substitutions whatsoever.
Edited 9/18/2007 2:37:17 PM by GM-Raonne
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
GM-JuicePats
To:
raonne
This Post:
0
1070.8
in reply to
1070.7
Date: 9/18/2007 2:45:56 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
304
I'm really confused as to what is wrong with SFDC.
It seems to work very well for me.
NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
Vikman
To:
GM-JuicePats
This Post:
0
1070.9
in reply to
1070.8
Date: 9/18/2007 4:03:18 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1
I agree with JuicePats, I use to hate LCD, then I hated SFDC now I have played both of them and they both work fine for me. I play LCD more but I don't have any problem with SFDC.
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
GM-JuicePats
To:
Vikman
This Post:
0
1070.10
in reply to
1070.9
Date: 9/18/2007 4:43:32 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
304
I tend to play SFDC unless I have a must-win game.
SFDC does an excellent job of distributing minutes.
NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
Mark Unread
Ignore User
Disable Emoticons and Images