BuzzerBeater Forums

the game shape comment was from me, and was not aimed at your decision. I made comment that game shape does not always warrant a start over better skilled players. The comment was actually made in reference to my own findings in u21 team, with Snyder playing well despite his game shape dip.

My knowledge of Wayne/Mahurkars skills and game shape was not strong, it was just a comment adding to discussion on team selection.

Btw good choice on playing Macmillan over Brar. At first i was shocked you chose Rmac as a PG backup over him, then looked at offense chosen and it made sense. I believe you were rewarded in his output!

I just want to see my boy play. I'm not sure that playing 11 minutes in a scrimmage means that a better player should be benched in favor of an inferior one. Besides, that should really be applied consistently if you are going to do it - Wayne has played 11 minutes this season before tonight's game, while Scoggins had played over 50 - so going by that argument Wayne should have started ahead of Scoggins (I'm not suggesting he should have, for the record).

To be honest, I'm not terribly fussed for a one off game - these games are pretty meaningless at the moment. But I have my chip on my shoulder that Wayne is being pretty underrated at the moment, so I gotta push my boy ;).

(I'll note that Wayne backed me up by having a pretty darn good game in the minutes he played - 6 points and 9 rebounds in 16 minutes is handy, plus the fact that the opposing centers combined to score a grand total of 0 points while he was on the court).

I think the gameshape comment is fair to, but I'm not concerned if you want to reward good gameshape at this stage. I'd hope that, once the crunch games hit that, for example, RMac in strong GS starts ahead of Grief in proficient.

You also got to keep in mind that you should also reward good work ethics. Sometimes you give your boy 48 to 65 minutes every week and game shape still fluctuates. Its random like that.

(35433)

It's half time in our match against an Arab oil giant at Bay Stadium. Come and watch the 2nd half if you so please...

No clear MVP in routine win over United Arab Emirates

Princeton offence is an offence that is very hit or miss in this game from my experiences using it. But with Michael Wayne starting at PF for this game, I felt that this would be an example of it working well. And with the team shooting 46-89 FG (51.7%) and 8-25 3PT (32%), my gut feeling appears to have been proven right, though to be fair we were facing a team with almost no backcourt presence whatsoever.

(seriously, their starting PG had a 14k salary)

The win puts us 3-0 in the group, and with Hanguk aka South Korea up next, we should make that 4-0 to leave us with two matches that will only affect the seeding for the second round draw against Malaysia and Japan. I found it very difficult to name one MVP for this game, as no less than four players present a solid claim to being the MVP of the match. They'll each receive one point, and I'll leave it in the hands of whoever replies to this thread between now and the next game to tell me which two players receive an extra point, which will make it add up to 6 points awarded.

1 point: Ryan McMillan (10-17 FG, 2-6 3PT, 22 points, 2 rebounds, 2 assists)
1 point: Luka Cicvaric (7-14 FG, 3-6 3PT, 19 points, 4 rebounds, 4 assists)
1 point: Michael Wayne (5-9 FG, 2-3 3PT, 12 points, 9 rebounds, 5 assists)
1 point: Will Williams (5-9 FG, 10 points, 7 rebounds, 6 assists)

Last edited by Jay (OTT) at 12/16/2015 10:16:09 AM

Michael Wayne for putting in a Draymond Green type performance.

Due to a lack of replies other than Koop's, I'm giving the 6th and final point in the voting to Luka Cicvaric. Because Nepotism :P.

Tonight we play against Hanguk aka South Korea in the Concrete Jungle. Watch the match and join the chat here:

(35435)

Scully dominant, Australia now assured second round spot

Not that it was ever in doubt to begin with, but with the 120-56 win over South Korea, Australia moves to 4-0 in the preliminary phase of the Asian Championship and now cannot mathematically finish lower than 4th (in practice, 3rd due to the PD difference between us and South Korea).

Kerehi Scully's only brick of the night was one missed free throw attempt in an otherwise superior 20 point display. There were few bad performances across the board to speak of though in a game which saw the Australian team shoot 53-88 FG, a 60.2% success rate.

The next two games should provide a much stronger gauge of where our team actually stands in regards to competing for the title, with Malaysia and then Japan coming up.

3 points: Kerehi Scully (20 points, 9-9 FG, 12 rebounds, 3 blocks)
2 points: Michael Wayne (17 points, 7-10 FG, 6 rebounds, 3 steals)
1 point: Ryan McMillan (13 points, 5-8 FG, 5 rebounds, 4 assists)

I'm pleased to announce the debut of 26 year old emerging Small Forward talent, Chris Gingut, in tonight's match against Mayalsia. Our first real test of the tournament, come watch if you so wish:

(35438)

Our first real test of the tournament

hmmmm, not quite .... but in a good way ;)

Thanks for giving Chris Gingut the chance he's been waiting for all his life! Not a great debut for Gingut (shooting only 2-9) but he managed a decent game rating (18.5). Hopefully he puts in some better performances worthy of his skillset in the next few games.

It's been a long road dedicated to training him specifically at the cost of being competitive, so it's a great feeling being rewarded for the efforts. Still a long way to go!