Excuse me! Were is Serbia?:-) .... I'm joking :D
25; Serbia; $9,150,361 (77.1%); 41,870,700 (75.0%)
High salaries can also prove about mismanagement of money :) BTW Salaries are changing during the season.
A completely fair point and I agree. That was the reason I proposed to use average bbstats and standard deviation for each league members' competitive games (including cup games).
I think league is as strong as 3-4 best teams from this league. It doesn't so important how high salary have teams number 15 or 16.
I don't agree with this. I think you just need 1 team better than yours and even if you have the second best team in BB, you may not win anything. Using 3 or 4 is convenient to proving your point but it is not the core of the problem. Why not use 1 or 2 or 8 teams then? For one, winning in a league with a dominant team with all the key NT players would be even harder. Also, leagues where the bottom teams are stronger are generally more challenging in my opinion: it's harder to manage minutes (less garbage time) and it's also harder to mix up the lineups to win both league games in a week.
Let's choose the best 2-3 teams from each country and compete in Private League :D Let's solve it on the pitch:-)
I'm not familiar with how private league games work, whether it's affected by Enth, but I assume they are affected at least by GS. As I said to your fellow countryman, if you sterilised enth and GS and did a league like that you'd probably find the best teams, not necessarily the best league and not even the best manager (as you'd take away key parts of team management). Unless we all agree that the best league is the league with the top 2 teams, as far as players go.
I'd agree with you that they could remove home court from BBB and use an ad hoc enthusiasm which is built up on BBB games independently from league games. This would somewhat level the playing field, although it would still be down to chance to get opponents that you could TIE in BBB...
Last edited by Lemonshine at 10/21/2014 10:00:47