BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > forum day topic: Potential

forum day topic: Potential

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Sparkle

This Post:
00
29708.19 in reply to 29708.18
Date: 05/10/2008 07:56:02
Overall Posts Rated:
2525

So for me the limit given by the potential could be longer to reach with outside player than with inside player.
??


Assuming the inside and the outside trainer train under a level 10 trainer every week and have the same potential, I would think both will hit it at the same time as opposed to the outside player taking longer to hit it.

I would think it's like dropping marbles into a bowl, with potential level being the bowl and marbles the weekly training. Doesn't matter which side of the bowl the marbles end up, once you get a certain number in that's it.

Unless of course if you're saying potential limit for outside players SHOULD be higher. I seriously hope this should not be the case as players such as the multiskilled SF position would blur the line.

Last edited by Sparkle at 05/10/2008 07:58:20

This Post:
00
29708.20 in reply to 29708.17
Date: 05/10/2008 08:07:57
Overall Posts Rated:
3535
It seems it will be difficult to build $50k wage PGs/SGs if so that need 6 skills as if you distribute 60 points over the 6 areas you get a 6x Prominent player vs you could have a Center with 4x15 Marvellous (clearly a much more wage heavy and I assume effective player)

Same old story...
A SG does not need passing and handling (not more than a C) and a PG does not need high JR.
PFs also need JS.

After the half season changes do you still think that training C/PF gives advantages to PG/SG training?



This Post:
00
29708.21 in reply to 29708.20
Date: 05/10/2008 08:12:01
Overall Posts Rated:
196196
It seems it will be difficult to build $50k wage PGs/SGs if so that need 6 skills as if you distribute 60 points over the 6 areas you get a 6x Prominent player vs you could have a Center with 4x15 Marvellous (clearly a much more wage heavy and I assume effective player)

Same old story...
A SG does not need passing and handling (not more than a C) and a PG does not need high JR.
PFs also need JS.

After the half season changes do you still think that training C/PF gives advantages to PG/SG training?




Well I just havent got a clue! Why does a SG not need Passing?

I think at the Allstar level training C/PF is more efficient (I am a guard trainer) as you can currently build 60-70k salary centres and to build an equivalent PG (wage wise) you by the sounds of it need a player with higher potential....

This Post:
00
29708.22 in reply to 29708.21
Date: 05/10/2008 11:45:35
Overall Posts Rated:
3535
Well I just havent got a clue! Why does a SG not need Passing?

I don't say that a SG does not need passing... but a respectable passing and handling is probably good enough even for best SGs.
From what you say PG and SG seem to be the same position.

In my team:
C with respectable passing: 4.4 assists per game (24.7 min average)
PG with respectable passing: 4.5 assists (30.3 min)

I think at the Allstar level training C/PF is more efficient (I am a guard trainer) as you can currently build 60-70k salary centres and to build an equivalent PG (wage wise) you by the sounds of it need a player with higher potential....

You know, managers training centers complain because their salary increases too fast compared to guards :)

From: ned

This Post:
00
29708.23 in reply to 29708.22
Date: 05/10/2008 11:51:34
Freccia Azzurra
IV.18
Overall Posts Rated:
821821
Second Team:
Slaytanic
You know, managers training centers complain because their salary increases too fast compared to guards


Maybe in the past, as I've written somewhere, I've seen a center similar to one of my SF (monoskill both), my SF is 20k/week, the center was 14k/week

Last edited by ned at 05/10/2008 11:51:53

1990-2022 Stalinorgel - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pV-Xppl6h8Et
From: Newton07

To: ned
This Post:
00
29708.24 in reply to 29708.23
Date: 05/10/2008 11:57:47
Overall Posts Rated:
3535
You know that the salary formula is very complex. For example, two similar centers, with difference only in SB can have very different salaries...
I guess it is even more difficult to compare different positions... but it is a fact that centers (mainly Brazilian) have all the highest salaries in BB :)

This Post:
00
29708.27 in reply to 29708.26
Date: 05/10/2008 13:12:10
Overall Posts Rated:
506506
Lol, so it should be the weigthed average of the important skills per position if I understand it right.

Last edited by BB-Patrick at 05/10/2008 13:12:20

This Post:
00
29708.28 in reply to 29708.27
Date: 05/10/2008 14:05:05
Overall Posts Rated:
2525
Lol, so it should be the weigthed average of the important skills per position if I understand it right.


Going by what is being speculated, a Center will have his potential on the weighted average of important skills for a Center (inside) and a SF will have a wider array of skills to hit the ceiling. Which means a Center will have a lower total skill potential than a SF.

But what if I attempt to convert my Center to a SF? Will the potential be recalculated from a Center's to a SF's once the position changes?

This Post:
00
29708.29 in reply to 29708.25
Date: 05/10/2008 18:43:18
Overall Posts Rated:
2626
have you considerd impact of potencial on transfers?
i need pg backup and i am looking on tl.
even if i find pg with skils witch i am looking for, i wil not buy him if has potencial belove 4-5.
and i am not training outside players.

Advertisement