BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Forums Day - What's changable?

Forums Day - What's changable?

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
112437.1
Date: 09/19/2009 13:56:28
Overall Posts Rated:
00
To what extent is the Eight-and-Eight structure set in stone? I've argued on another thread that divisions of five-five-five-five would have various advantages (enhancing rivalries, fixing the problem of fifth, and making new divisions seem less insurmountable) but I'm interested in the extent to which the current system is seen by the BBs as unchangable (obviously, many others have equally good ideas re: relegation playoffs etc).

Similarly, to what extent are training types seen as a finished product? There's a lot of forum chatter re: "remove handling", more SF training options, etc - are these aspects completely fixed, or is it worth us in the community trying establish on consensus on this sort of thing?

Anyway, keep up all the wonderful work.

This Post:
00
112437.3 in reply to 112437.2
Date: 09/19/2009 14:42:47
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Thank you for a lovely and informative answer!

This Post:
00
112437.4 in reply to 112437.3
Date: 09/19/2009 14:45:39
Overall Posts Rated:
182182
I would really like to be able to tune your own match kits. Is this in your thoughts at all for the (quite near) future..?

!zazhigai!
This Post:
00
112437.6 in reply to 112437.5
Date: 09/19/2009 14:56:55
Overall Posts Rated:
182182
For me, I think the white neutral shirts in the player images could be like it is, until you find a solution then, but it would be nice if even the small match kits in the upper left corner of your club page would be tunable.:) Thanks for answering.

!zazhigai!
This Post:
00
112437.7 in reply to 112437.6
Date: 09/19/2009 15:06:01
1986 Celtics
IV.10
Overall Posts Rated:
88
I will also say that we would look at a contribution if someone wanted to come up with some different looking faces, or different looking jerseys that all worked with our current ones, but that's hard to do, especially for charles, mark and I who are not the most artistically talented of folks.